[1]中国市场监管报. 张茅在全国市场监管工作会议上的讲话摘编[EB/OL].(2018-12-28)[2019-08-16].http://www.cicn.com.cn/zggsb/201812/28/cms113995article.shtml.
[2]United States Supreme Court. Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.: 220 U.S. 373 (1911)[A].
[3]United States Supreme Court. Supreme Court. Monsanto Co. v. SprayRite Svc. Corp.: 465 U.S. 752 (1984)[A].
[4]United States Supreme Court. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc.: 551 U.S. 877 (2007)[A].
[5]王健. 垄断协议认定与排除、限制竞争的关系研究[J]. 法学, 2014(3):35-49.
[6]上海市物价局.行政处罚决定书:第2520160027号[A].
[7]上海市物价局.行政处罚决定书:第2520170031号[A].
[8]上海市物价局.行政处罚决定书:第2520170032号[A].
[9]上海市高级人民法院.北京锐邦涌和科贸有限公司与强生(上海)医疗器材有限公司、强生(中国)医疗器材有限公司纵向垄断协议纠纷案:(2012)沪高民三(知)终字第63号[A].
[10]中国知识产权律师网.徐新明.广东省首例纵向垄断纠纷案件二审宣判[EB/OL].(2018-08-03)[2019-08-16].http://www.ciplawyer.cn/html/fldcpws/20180803/139777.html.
[11]仲春. 转售价格维持行为合法性的行政与司法判定标准:解读最高人民法院驳回海南裕泰公司再审裁定[N]. 中国市场监管报, 2019-07-16(007).
[12]欧盟委员会.纵向协议集体豁免条例:第1217/2010/EU号[A].
[13]European Commission. Antitrust: Commission fines four consumer electronics manufacturers for fixing online resale prices[EB/OL].(2018-07-24)[2019-08-16].https://europa.eu/rapid/pressrelease_IP184601_e〖JP〗n.htm
[14]苏华.分销行为的反垄断规制[M].法律出版社:北京,2012:139-161.
[15]上海市物价局.行政处罚决定书:第2520160009号[A].
[16]国家发展和改革委员会.行政处罚决定书:[2016]8号[A].
[17]Court of Justice of the European Union.tablissements Consten S.à.R.L. and GrundigVerkaufsGmbH v Commission of the European Economic Community: Joined cases 56 and 58/64[A].
[18]European Commission. Antitrust: Commission fines Nike 125 million for restricting crossborder sales of merchandising products[EB/OL].(2019-03-25)[2019-08-16].https://europa.eu/rapid/pressrelease_IP191828_en.htm.
[19]European Commission. Antitrust: Commission fines Guess 40 million for anticompetitive agreements to block crossborder sales[EB/OL].(2018-12-17)[2019-08-16].https://europa.eu/rapid/pressrelease_IP186844_en.htm.
[20]曹红英. 欧盟关于禁止垄断协议与滥用市场支配地位行为的规定及实务[J]. 中国工商管理研究, 2014(11):24-28.
[21]Court of Justice of the European Union. Groupement d’achat Edouard Leclerc v Commission, Case T88/92[A].
[22]Court of Justice of the European Union. Coty Germany GmbH v. Parfümerie Akzente GmbH, Case C230/16[A].
[1]朱光琪.标准必要专利禁令救济的反垄断法规制[J].浙江理工大学学报,2018,39-40(社科4):395.
ZHU Guangqi.Antitrust laws of injunction relief for SEPs[J].Journal of Zhejiang Sci-Tech University,2018,39-40(社科5):395.
[2]徐劲科,陈洲,陈昱嘉,等.中国时尚、零售业跨境并购交易法律问题研究[J].浙江理工大学学报,2019,41-42(社科5):524.
XU Jinke,CHEN Zhou,CHEN Yujia,et al.Research on legal issues about crossborder acquisition transaction of China′s fashion and retail industries[J].Journal of Zhejiang Sci-Tech University,2019,41-42(社科5):524.