[1] Boush D M, Shipp S, Loken B, et al. Affect generalization to similar and dissimilar brand extensions[J]. Psychology and Marketing, 1987, 4(3): 225-237.
[2] Aaker D, Keller K L. Consumer evaluations of brand extensions[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1990, 54(1): 27-41.
[3] Boush D M, Loken B. A processtracing study of brand extension evaluation[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1991, 28(1): 16-28.
[4] Keller K L, Aaker D. The effects of sequential introduction of brand extensions[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1992, 29(1): 35-50.
[5] V lckner F, Sattle H. Drivers of brand extension success[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2006, 70(2): 18-34.
[6] Klink R R, Smith D C. Threats to the external validity of brand extension research[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2001, 38(3): 326-335.
[7] Bridges S, Keller K L, Sood S. Communication strategies for brand extensions: enhancing perceived fit by establishing explanatory links[J]. Journal of Advertising, 2000, 29(4): 1-11.
[8] Lane V R. The impact of ad repetition and ad content on consumer perceptions of incongruent extensions[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2000, 64(2): 80-91.
[9] Chaiken S. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 39(5): 752-766.
[10] Cacioppo J T, Petty R E, Kao C F, et al. Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: an individual difference perspective[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(5): 1032-1043.
[11] Ratneshwar S, Chaiken S. Comprehension’s role in persuasion: the case of its moderating effect on the persuasive impact of source cues[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1991, 18(1): 52-62.
[12] Zhang S, Sood S. “Deep” and “surface” cues: brand extension evaluations by children and adults[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2002, 29(1): 129-141.
[13] Zaichkowsky J L. Measuring the involvement construct[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1985, 12(3): 341-352.
[14] Petty R E, Cacioppo J T, Schumann D. Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: the moderating role of involvement[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1983, 10(2): 135-146.
[15] Homer P M, Kahle L R. Source expertise, time of source identification, and involvement in persuasion: an elaborative processing perspective[J]. Journal of Advertising, 1990, 19(1): 30-39.
[16] Mackenzie S B, Spreng R A. How does motivation moderate the impact of central and peripheral processing on brand attitudes and intentions?[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1992, 18(4): 519-529.
[17] Petty R E, Cacioppo J T. The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: central and peripheral routes to persuasion[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984, 46(1): 9-81.
[18] Petty R E, Schumann D W, Richman S A, et al. Positive mood and persuasion: different roles for affect under high and low elaboration conditions[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1993, 64(1): 5-20.
[19] 原永丹. 品牌延伸有效性的影响因素及其作用机理研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2010.
[20] Barone M J, Miniard P W, Romeo J B. The influence of positive mood on brand extension evaluations[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2000, 26(1): 386-400.
[21] Maheswaran D, Chaiken S. Promoting systematic processing in lowmotivation settings: effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1991, 61(1): 13-25.[22] Chaiken S, Maheswaran D. Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994, 66(3): 460-473.
[23] Barone M J. The interactive effects of mood and involvement on brand extension evaluations[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2005, 15(3): 263-270.
[24] Maoz E, Tybout A M. The moderating role of involvement and differentiation in the evaluation of brand extensions[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2002, 12(2): 119-131.