|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]Sindy DingVoorhees.时尚法:国际视野与中国发展——从美国与欧洲对时尚保护的源起、现状、立法与司法实践谈起[J].浙江理工大学学报,2019,41-42(社科5):513-523.
 Sindy Ding Voorhees.Fashion Law: International perspectives and China′s prospects for development:Using U.S. and European systems and their evolution as a frame of reference for China′s own fashion law development[J].Journal of Zhejiang Sci-Tech University,2019,41-42(社科5):513-523.
点击复制

时尚法:国际视野与中国发展——从美国与欧洲对时尚保护的源起、现状、立法与司法实践谈起()
分享到:

浙江理工大学学报[ISSN:1673-3851/CN:33-1338/TS]

卷:
第41-42卷
期数:
2019年社科5期
页码:
513-523
栏目:
出版日期:
2019-09-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Fashion Law: International perspectives and China′s prospects for development:Using U.S. and European systems and their evolution as a frame of reference for China′s own fashion law development
文章编号:
1673-3851 (2019) 10-0513-11
作者:
Sindy DingVoorhees
凯拓国际律师事务所,美国纽约 10036
Author(s):
Sindy DingVoorhees
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, New York, U.S. 10036
关键词:
时尚法时尚设计保护知识产权保护美国司法欧盟设计法
分类号:
DF414
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
法律与时尚行业的交叉自从时装品牌的建立,或者说从人类开始制作服装开始便一直存在。这种关系随着时尚行业的发展以及行业中法律问题的探究,逐渐演变并被总结成欧洲和美国先后提出的时尚法。时尚法在欧洲与美国的讨论始于时尚设计保护的抗争,通过立法与司法上的努力形成了今天对时尚保护的法律格局。在这个过程中,时尚行业中的法律问题被不断细化,从知识产权到商业、行业中的参与者等,方方面面催生出时尚法这一套行业法资源。从法律和社会层面系统地认知、关注、解释和指导时尚行业在新的国际格局下的发展。中国的时尚产业已成为世界时尚格局中强劲而不可或缺的一部分,时尚市场的持续蓬勃和不断开放、自由的商业环境需要法律为行业的发展进行适时的梳理、规范,并为其保驾护航,这都成为了在中国时尚语境下提出和开展时尚法的重要意义。

参考文献/References:

[1]Hunt  A. Governance of the Consuming Passions: A History of Sumptuary Law[M]. UK: Palgrave Macmillan,1996: 18-19, 140.
[2]Garber M. Vested Interests: Cross Dressing and Cultural Anxiety[M]. New York: Routledge, 1992: 21-37.
[3]Jenkins D. The Cambridge History of Western Textile[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
[4]Scafidi S. Intellectual property and fashion design[J]. Intellectual Property and Information Wealth 2006 (1):115.
[5]Tennent J M. A Treatise on the Copyright of Designs for Printed Fabrics [M].London:Rarebooksclub.com,2012: 11.
[6]Perrot P. Fashioning the Bourgeoisie: A History of Clothing in the Nineteenth Century[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994: 184-188.[7]Stewart M L. Copying and copyrighting haute couture: Democratizing fashion, 19001930s[J]. French Hist. Stud. 2005 (28): 103, 11830.
[8]Agins T. The End of Fashion: How Marketing Changed the Clothing Business Forever[M]. New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc., 2000: 23-25.
[9]Leonard H B. Enterprising Elite: The Boston Associates and the world they made (review)[J]. Civil War History, 1988, 34(3):283-284.
[10]Drexl J, Hilty R M, Boy L, et al. Technologie et Concurrence: Mélanges en l’honneur de Hanns Ullrich[M]. Brussels: Larcier,2009:218.
[11]Trigg J A, Henderson H W. Something for designers to (maybe) cheer about: Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands[EB/OL]. (2017-05-02) [2019-07-02]. https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/somethingfordesignerstomaybecheer13418/.
[12]Leonard N L. Applying Copyright Law to Useful Articles  A Dispute Over Cheerleading Uniforms May Result in a New, Unified Test[EB/OL]. (2016-10-04) [2019-07-02]. https://www.wardandsmith.com/articles/applyingcopyrightlaw to usefularticles.
[13]Herzaca L, Hogan H. Fashion Law and Business: Brands and Retailers[M]. New York: Practicing Law Institute, 2013: 157.
[14]Trade Dress, International Trademark Association, Fact Sheets: Types of Protection[EB/OL]. (2015-11-27) [2019-07-09].http://www.inta.org/TrademarkBasics/FactSheets/Pages/TradeDress.aspx.
[15]Marsh M M, SardesaiGrant N. Safe protection/safe inspiration: An introduction to Intellectual Property Law for Fashion Designs[J].Emerging Issues 2012: 6821.
[16]Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc., et al. 17 U.S.C., § 101. “Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands”[J]. IIC  International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2017:1-3.
[17]Van Keymeulen E, Nash L. Fashionably late[J]. Intellectual Property Magazine, 2012(1): 53.
[18]Xiao E Y. The new trend: Protecting American fashion designs through national copyright measures[J]. Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J., 2010 (23): 405412.
[19]Bretonniere J F, Fontaine F. Europe: Using Community design rights to protect creativity[J].Building and enforcing intellectual property,2010 (32):17.
[20]Hing R, Cassidy L, Karen Millen Fashions Ltd v. Dunnes Stores, Dunnes Stores (Limerick) Ltd: Clarifying the assessment of individual character in EU designs[J]. The Trademark Reporter 2015, 105 (6): 1446.
[21]Ladas, Parry. The Court of Justice of The European Union Strengthens Unregistered Community Design Rights[EB/OL]. (2014-06-19) [2019-07-05]. https://ladas.com/educationcenter/courtjusticeeuropeanunionstrengthensunregisteredcommunitydesignrights/.
[22]Gauss H, Guimberteau B, Bennett L. Red soles aren’t made for walking: A comparative study of European Fashion Laws[J]. Landslide,2013,7(1): 5-6.
[23]Easterbrook F H. Cyberspace and the law of the horse[J].University of Chicago Legal Forum, 2015, 1(7): 210.〖JP〗
[24]Scafidi S. Fiat Fashion Law! The Launch of A Label and a New Branch of Law, in Navigating Fashion Law[M]. U.S.: Thomson Reuters, 2012: 7.[25]陆娅楠,吴秋余,刘志强,等. 法治是最好的营商环境[N]. 人民日报,2019-05-05 (01).
[26]张玉玲. 为文化产业发展保驾护航:《文化产业促进法(草案征求意见稿)》面向社会征求意见[N]. 光明日报,2019-07-28 (05).

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-08-16
网络出版日期:2019-09-16
作者简介:Sindy DingVoorhees (丁文锦,1987-),女,美国纽约人(原籍吉林长春),硕士,美国纽约州执业律师,主要从事知识产权与时尚法方面的研究。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-11-04